To cc or to not cc

I actually think email is amazing, it is actually quite mind-boggling to think that information I type into a message is received by another person within minutes, anywhere in the world…So I don’t have any issues with email as such but it does have its problems.

One of the most annoying things in my view is the use of “cc” ,  It would seem that not everyone uses it in the same way.  My understanding (i could be wrong of course) is that the use of “cc” is to ensure that those people who are included in the “cc” field are included “for information” purposes and are not being asked the questions related in the email.

However with the emergence of social networks and forums etc, is the “cc” field actually still a valid field to use. If you feel someone ought to be made aware of a communication and feel that there is a potential for them to contribute then why don’t we just include them in the main message.

I know it isn’t really a problem and it doesn’t even matter to most people…but on days when you need to prioritise your mailbox, those messages where I am not the primary intended receiver then I will leave them for another day.

I guess just another reason why we ought to rethink our use of communications technologies.

Ok rant over…

BAN Internal Email

Like most people i receive hundreds of emails and most (if i’m honest) are not really for me, but i get copied in because others think i am interested.

Well i believe the answer is quite simple but radical in local government terms.

BAN INTERNAL EMAIL

Yes, ban internal email altogether for staff. Why do we do it and what purpose does it actually serve. Who really understand when to CC, or even BCC someone in and why would you actually Blind copy someone in (i admit i have done this before but wondered why i actually did it afterwards).

I would prefer to receive email only from customers or external organisations, that way i would know for sure that it was going to be at least business related (spam aside for a minute). I’d stop getting emails about lunch and copied into email conversations half way through and be expected to read the rest which scrolls for hours on end.

Well i’d like to propose that we seek to explore replacing internal email with more modern tool, which reflect the way we interact with each other and the increasing demands on knowing things “now” instead of when someone reads their email and decides to reply.

The answer (or suggestion anyway):

Internal Social Network – This would capture the conversations (formal and informal) which occur, but would be tagged by users and commented on by others who also add tags. It puts the individual in control of what content and conversations they participate in. Much more effective then the classic old school “CC”.

Instant Messenger – This would compliment the social network (depending on platform of course) with instant communication potential and presence awareness. That way i would know whether someone i need to speak to was actually available at that moment in time. This would make decisions and networking more productive coupled with a social network. I’d also use this tool to find out whether a colleague wanted to get a coffee or lunch. Much, much better than email.

Now you might ask, what am i actually doing about this. Well we are piloting an internal social networking platform, which is great and provides increased opportunity to engage wider people because i no longer have to think about “who might be interested”. The system and others users enable that to happen. The system flags to me stuff i have stated i want to be kept informed about (alerts etc) and i can see all “public” conversations and am able to contribute or comment on all of them.

I’d be very interested if anyone has actually made this move and i’d be keen to know how the staff perceived the change and more so, how internal communications has improved.

Anyway, i’ll keep on pressing and moving forward.