As you can tell I’m all for imaginative blog post titles 🙂
Anyway what I would like to reflect on is how I believe LocalGovDigital became more real, more present, more about the network and collaboration as opposed to the steering group at LocalGovCamp and how through the conversations at the open steering group I realised we had finally achieved what we needed to in order to make real and lasting progress.
Let me explain…
For me and for others LocalGovDigital as an unnamed network started at the very first LocalGovCamp and what made that so successful was it created new connections, new collaborations, new discussions etc but what we didn’t really focus on back then was creating collaborative outputs (OK, some were created and some people tried) but nothing has really appeared that has transformed a service.
When LocalGovDigital formally came together nearly 2 years ago now, we came together through a shared vision, shared values, shared aspirations and I guess at the time and more importantly shared frustrations.
We all wanted to see something change, we wanted to think different and do different…so we tried a few things as a small group of people and called ourselves the steering group and it started to do stuff.
However one of the issues for me and others was that the capacity of those within the steering group was limited and therefore we decided (rightly or wrongly) to focus on small outputs, manageable and extensions of the “day job” as we were and still are all voluntary.
As time progressed more and more people recognised the value of the network and the collective voice and action of practitioners. We were a “Thing”, we were seen as formal when we weren’t. We needed and have started to understand what all of this really means and how we can make change happen.
LocalGovDigital has never been about the steering group, it has always been about the network, the people who do stuff, make stuff, change stuff, design stuff and share stuff.
The steering groups role was merely an attempt to do the following:
- Mobilise the existing network, not grow a new one
- Amplify the voice of practitioners, not simply share it
- Make and do things instead of just talking and meeting
- Be networked and collaborative instead of simply networking with each other
So the change I saw at LocalGovCamp this year was that people recognised they were the network, that we are all the network and if we collectively want to see things change we all need to help and give some time to make and do things differently. The steering groups role needs to change and adapt and that has to be about doing those things above and creating the spaces for people to come together to collaborate, to make, to do and share.
We also need to clarify our focus and that has to be about outcomes and not about specific products. I wouldn’t want to get into a situation where we are recommending specific platforms and saying implement that and you will see change as we all know that doesn’t work. However what we do want to do is support good stuff.
My colleague Martin Howitt summed it up very nicely recently, he said:
LocalGovDigital aims to support and collaborate with everyone in and around the sector. We want to focus on outcomes rather than specific groups or people.
That is to say that if someone builds or creates something brilliant and someone else does something similar then that’s brilliant too because we can all learn from it. It’s the learning that is important and not the product or the organisation that produces it.
So my final reflection is about my contribution – what is it I can do to help?
One of the biggest issues for me is the skills and capacity of those in the sector to make change happen…that isn’t to say there isn’t any capacity and skills, but it just isn’t always well-developed, doing the right things or focused on the right outcomes…so my focus is to look at how that can be solved in practical ways.
6 thoughts on “Further reflections from LocalGovCamp and about LocalGovDigital”
I will no doubt be accused of heresy, but I would prefer to drop ‘digital’. I visited Hampshire CC today and this group seem to be specifying demand for telecare services purely by desired outcomes. The outcomes may be for improved mobility, safely living alone without daily visits, involving family members as responders to alerts … etc. Technology is often part of the solution, but only within a total system of social care.
So what we can all do to help is; set outcome based challenges to teams. The leaders should be the practitioners who are responsible for improving outcomes. Bring in ideas from any source, not just technologists. Open up competitions with small prizes – invite the general public, students and volunteers. Don’t insist on “digital”, but welcome it where it has clear benefits.
Kent Connects ran some open challenges and got some interesting results and learning.
I don’t think that is heresy at all…i think you will find that the majority of those currently engaged in LocalGovDigital feel the same 🙂
Great stuff! We’re one of the sponsors of GovCamp Cymru (http://govcampcymru.org/) this year. As it’s early days the outputs may not be quite as developed, but there’s lots we can learn from your approaches and feed into this event. Keep up the good work!
thanks, I think we could and should link up the learning from these events more and collaborate wider on the outputs and issues to ensure something actually gets done
Sounds like a plan! Although we’re not running this one directly, we’d definitely love to chat about linking learning from both together. If you’re free for a chat at some point it would be great to discuss what that might look like?