Thoughts on BBC NEWS | Facebook banned for council staff

Standard

Now this is a very interesting story, not just because another council has banned access to a social networking site, but because the lack of tackling the real issues.

A council is to ban Facebook on its computers after it was revealed staff spent on average 400 hours on the site every month.

Portsmouth City Council said it had decided to change its policy and block access to the social networking site.

It added the figures equated to each of its 4,500 staff, who have access to computers, spending between five and six minutes a month on the site.

via BBC NEWS | England | Hampshire | Facebook banned for council staff.

The headlines in many of today’s newspapers are interesting but in fact that are inaccurate and do not truly represent the real issues around “waste” in councils.

Now i am in full support of eradicating waste in business and in processes, but this is not a good way to go about it and in fact reduces the opportunities that could be realised by council by using such sites for communications and engagement activities.

What i would suggest the headlines should read which would truly represent the real factor behind this story is:

Lack of Management in Council leads to 400 hours a month being wasted

Now I get really annoyed and frustrated when i see councils make decisions like this because the real thing to concentrate on is the lack of management is that leading to this amount of time being wasted.

Why are we not focusing on the poor management practices or lack of performance management instead of the 5-6 minutes per employee per month on facebook.

It is easy for councils to focus and even target sites like facebook because they can monitor and measure usage through the corporate networks (unless of course people are accessing on their mobiles or via wifi connections)

BUT what about the other activities that could be classified as “waste” that we are not focusing on for example: phone calls, chatting with friends, emailing friends and colleagues plus many more including smoking.

It is quite sad that people are focusing on the technology when that is not the problem, just like technology itself can not solve business problems. What needs to happen here when these kind of decisions are made is to ask the question “What are we really trying to stop?” Is it time wasting? or is it access to social networks that councils don’t on the whole understand? i would suggest the latter.

There is a huge opportunity to promote such networks, in fact i am a member of a government funded and supported social network (IDeA Community of Practice) so i would ask what fundamentally is the difference between the two platforms from a technology point of view? How much council officer time is taken up accessing the community of practice and would this also be classified as “waste”? I feel that being part of that community saves me time in accessing information and research from other council staff and stops me emailing them or phoning them for the same information. This is what social networks can facilitate – information and knowledge exchange.

Now i’m not promoting facebook as such, but this is a decision which allows councils to make further blocks and banning orders easier unless they start to truly understand what is happening in online spaces where communities are alive and thriving and councils need to be connected if they want to understand the needs of local people in designing services. Would we consider a member of staff visiting a village hall and listening to community issues and communicating with them about council services a “waste” of time or would that be considered community engagement? If so then why ban access to social networking sites…

Another excuse for a Wii

Standard

I saw this post in the latest eGov Bulletin (register here to receive). I must admit that I am a fan of the Wii, although i have not personally got one. It is something i am looking to purchase in the near future. I post this because it just goes to show that multi-channel delivery is alive.

Will the next generation of this be a real life version of the Sims, with interactive voting for real people and involvement in local decisions etc. Something to ponder no doubt, whilst you select which character to play with on Mario Cart or how fit you are.

Games Console To Provide Information And E-Services.

The Nintendo Wii games console is to be used to provide health information and online services to the elderly and chronically ill across the UK, as part of a collaboration between the government’s Technology Strategy Board and DigiTV, an agency of Kirklees Council set up to provide access to services through interactive TV and mobile phones.

The games console will be used as a new channel to DigiTV’s ‘Looking Local’ portal, providing health and careĀ  information and creating a communication network for both carers and the cared-for, prolonging independent living. If trials are successful, the console could be used as a means of supplying other types of digital information. The Wii console was chosen for its accessible controls, which are easy to use for people with impaired hand control.

“Some may think that a games console is not relevant to the elderly, but once you look past the packaging and marketing, the Wii is actually very user-friendly for the elderly and can help tackle social isolation,” Steve Langrick of Kirklees told E-Government Bulletin.

“It’s about bringing the richness of the internet to a different platform.” Services delivered using games consoles could also offer a route to other target audiences. DigiTV spokesperson Caris Stoller said the service would be a useful method of engaging with young people in their homes or at community or youth centres. “It is an effective way of communicating with this group, meaning they could access services and information of which they may not otherwise take notice,” Stoller said.

Comment on this story now on EGB Live: